Street homelessness
By-name field architecture and an intake pathway identify the person before the offer.
02 · Architecture
From street extraction to independent market tenancy.
The current system context adds the Singular Prototype and a bifurcated telemetry doctrine to the original MDI → RDI → EDI sequence.
System context
A sequential pipeline, not a menu.
The repository frames the architecture as a dependency chain: biological security precedes relational stability; relational stability precedes economic reintegration.
Phase Zero
Ground Floor Intake Airlock, biological screening, first meal, hygiene, and immediate locked placement.
MDI → RDI
Physical stabilization is followed by Pod Steward continuity and identity capital accumulation.
EDI
Cooperative work and protected transition funding address the Return Deficit.
Market tenancy
Tenancy Bridge Guarantee supports the first twelve months, followed by 24-month verification.
Telemetry doctrine
Physical verification with a consent boundary.
The updated repository separates safety-critical monitoring from billing-linked occupancy telemetry. The distinction is architectural: protecting the building is not the same as conditioning housing on a resident's participation in a funding mechanism.
Safety-critical monitoring
Fire detection, catastrophic water pressure events, structural vibration anomalies, and related signals protect the physical asset. The specification describes this layer as a condition of occupancy comparable to ordinary building safety systems.
Non-negotiable for asset safetyBilling telemetry
Occupancy and billing telemetry authenticates biological presence for Medicaid/CalAIM capital. It is placed behind a Zero-Knowledge Billing Firewall and is not the same as optical surveillance.
Funding mechanism, not housing conditionPhilanthropic Set-Aside
Residents who decline billing-linked monitoring retain housing through units funded independently of the Medicaid billing path. Declining telemetry changes the funding mechanism, not the right to housing.
Housing remains protectedData ephemerality
The governance model specifies 24-hour cryptographic destruction of raw telemetry, facility-level aggregation, and temporal latency in public dashboards to prevent individual behavioral data lakes.
No historical identity timelineGround Floor AirlockImmediate placement and clinical intake
→
Singular Prototype$36.9M · 3 pods · 348 residents
→
Seven Binary MetricsIndependent review at 90/180/365 days
→
Hard Stop or ScaleExpansion only after threshold clearance
Scope restriction
Designed for chronic, high-acuity unsheltered homelessness.
The governance and capital documents explicitly state that the mega-tower stabilization architecture is not designed for economically displaced people whose primary barrier is rent burden or job loss. That population requires rapid rehousing or rental vouchers.
This boundary is part of the specification's attempt to prevent application beyond the evidentiary foundation it claims to address.