$50,000 baseline
The repository cites an approximate municipal annual cost per chronically unsheltered individual, while requiring jurisdiction-specific independent verification before use in fundraising or activation materials.
10 · Capital architecture
The capital architecture treats the Singular Prototype as a high-risk test: capital efficiency is the engine, but systemic dignity remains the destination.
The ghost asset problem
The repository's capital model argues that a spreadsheet entry is not proof that a stabilization unit exists or functions. It proposes remote verification of water flow, thermal load, air filtration performance, door-lock cycles, and other minimum physical signals without requiring optical access to residents' identities.
Telemetry is also described as a capital-defense mechanism: structural vibration, water pressure, and climate-pressurization anomalies can signal kinetic damage before a room is destroyed.
Design boundary: The physical housing creates biological efficiency. The sensors defend the asset and authenticate the selected funding path; they are not presented as the cause of Housing First outcomes.
Capital arbitrage
The repository cites an approximate municipal annual cost per chronically unsheltered individual, while requiring jurisdiction-specific independent verification before use in fundraising or activation materials.
An operating-only figure that excludes amortized capital debt and therefore must not be compared directly with the fully loaded status-quo baseline.
Including plausible financing terms, the repository frames a 42–52% arbitrage bound. The precise figure remains subject to independent financial review.
Provisionality: The capital documents state that financing terms, precise savings, published baseline sources, and CalAIM revenue offsets are not final until independent review is complete.
Ownership architecture
A commercial entity retains ownership of the base superstructure for capital efficiency. Residential ALMUs are severed through 99-year irrevocable master leases held by localized community land trusts. The Hostile Governance Trust is designed to keep the capital provider from controlling the right of eviction.
The funding fork
A resident who declines billing-linked monitoring is housed through a Philanthropic Set-Aside. The updated architecture describes this as a change in funding mechanism rather than a loss of housing, while acknowledging that the funding path carries a defined privacy exchange.
Source document
The source document contains the full physical telemetry, financing, leasehold, and capital-isolation argument.
Open capital architecture ↗