Evolutionary psychology explains that our core beliefs and values are shaped by both biological instincts and social influences. This plays a role in the current political division between progressivism and traditionalism. People are often drawn toward one of these extremes, as holding a middle ground becomes harder when these core beliefs clash with opposing views. This divide is influenced by how we are raised, educated, and manipulated through media, which tends to reinforce our biases and push us further apart.

Progressivism is guided by an idealistic vision for a future society, focusing on rapid social changes based on recent scientific advancements. It promotes equity and inclusion, with a goal of transforming current norms and structures to create a better world. Meanwhile, traditionalism relies on lessons from history and values passed down through generations. It supports steady and realistic growth, seeing gradual changes as the way to maintain stability and harmony.

In this environment, honest conversation and open dialogue are essential for progress. Unfortunately, it’s becoming harder to keep these conversations alive.

Some progressives see traditionalist perspectives as outdated and dismiss them, creating a widening gap in communication. This has led to the breakdown of relationships, where people stop engaging with those who hold different views, cutting off important conversations with friends, neighbors, and even family.

Traditionalists often support the free exchange of ideas, believing that all perspectives should be heard and debated. This mindset sees free speech as key to learning and growth.

Meanwhile, progressives focus on protecting society from harm, believing that certain ideas can perpetuate injustice or misinformation. They sometimes advocate for limiting speech they see as harmful to the collective good.

Both sides can be quick to accuse the other of intolerance, leading to mockery, contempt, and further division. The media plays a big role in this, often presenting opposing views in negative ways that deepen the divide. This results in echo chambers, where people are only exposed to ideas that support their own beliefs, missing the chance to learn from other perspectives.

The challenge is to balance protecting free speech with addressing the harm certain types of speech can cause. Without open dialogue, both sides risk becoming more extreme in their views, making it harder to find common ground. By encouraging conversation and listening to each other’s viewpoints, society can work toward understanding and growth, rather than isolation and division.

Instruction and encouragement for traditionalists and progressives in fostering meaningful and thoughtful dialogue should be tailored to their distinct approaches and values. Each group has its own framework for processing ideas, yet both can benefit from learning how to communicate respectfully and openly about all subjects, upholding free speech as a fundamental human right.

For traditionalists, instruction should emphasize the value of listening as much as speaking. Since many traditionalists prioritize historical lessons, instruction can frame free speech as a continuation of long-standing democratic values. They can be encouraged to engage thoughtfully with differing viewpoints by reflecting on how open debate has shaped society’s progress over time. Encouragement should focus on the importance of patience in discussions, reminding them that dialogue, even when challenging, has always been key to preserving freedom and finding common ground.

Progressives, on the other hand, tend to focus on the future and societal advancement. For them, instruction should highlight the idea that true progress requires the inclusion of all voices, even those with differing perspectives. They can be encouraged to view open dialogue as a vital tool for social change, recognizing that productive debates often lead to stronger, more inclusive solutions. Encouragement should frame free speech as a mechanism for evolving ideas and ensuring that progress is well-rounded, adaptable, and sustainable by engaging with those who may think differently.

Both groups will benefit from understanding that free speech is about expressing ideas together with a willingness to listen, grow, and engage constructively. Both groups should be supportive of free and open dialogue on all issues, however controversial the position, with a focus on fostering empathy, deeper understanding, and a healthier society.