With regard to the Congressional debate on the extent of influence that corporate entities should have over shaping public discourse and the potential implications for democratic discourse and information access, we have the following points to consider:

1. Corporate Influence: Congressional debate revolves around the degree of influence that corporate entities, particularly social media platforms, should hold in shaping public discourse and information dissemination.

2. Democratic Discourse: Lawmakers are grappling with how corporate moderation practices might impact democratic discourse, as limitations on content and discussions can affect citizens' ability to engage in open and diverse conversations on important issues.

3. Information Access: The extent to which corporate entities control access to information and regulate content raises concerns about citizens' access to accurate and diverse sources of information, potentially impacting informed decision-making.

4. Censorship vs. Regulation: The debate delves into whether corporate actions to moderate content are tantamount to censorship or if they constitute a form of necessary regulation to ensure the quality and accuracy of information shared online.

5. Public Interest vs. Private Control: Congress is considering whether corporate decisions align with the public interest or if they prioritize the profit-driven interests of the platforms, potentially shaping the narrative to suit their own agendas.

6. Transparency and Accountability: The debate focuses on demanding greater transparency from corporate entities regarding their moderation policies and decision-making processes, to ensure fairness and accountability.

7. Freedom of Expression: Lawmakers are examining how corporate content moderation practices might either uphold or infringe upon individuals' freedom of expression and their right to voice diverse perspectives.

8. Impact on Democracy: The congressional discussions also explore how the concentration of influence in the hands of a few corporations might impact the democratic principles of representation and the open exchange of ideas.

9. Bias and Discrimination: Concerns arise regarding potential biases in corporate content moderation, with debates centering on whether platforms may inadvertently or deliberately discriminate against certain viewpoints or marginalized voices.

10. Collaboration with Public Entities: Congress is evaluating potential partnerships or regulations that could enhance collaboration between corporate platforms and public entities to strike a balance between information regulation and democratic discourse.