Cycles of Change

Knowledge - Spirit - Culture - Growth

Red Planet Mars: When Science Fiction Met Divine Intervention

- Posted in History by

John L. Balderston understood the mechanics of fear. The Philadelphia journalist-turned-playwright had previously shaped the nightmares of a generation, scripting the creeping aristocratic dread of Dracula (1931) and the ancient curses of The Mummy (1932). Horror, in the estimation of Balderston, involved more than monsters; it represented the intrusion of the impossible into the mundane. In 1952, he brought this sensibility to a new frontier: the red planet.

Red Planet Mars stands as one of the strangest artifacts of the atomic age. Directed by Harry Horner, it is less a space adventure than a chamber drama, confined largely to a single, claustrophobic set: the home laboratory of Chris and Linda Cronyn (Peter Graves and Andrea King). There are no rocket ships or ray guns here. The primary special effect is a glowing "hydrogen tube," a piece of pseudo-scientific set dressing that serves as the conduit for a plot that swerves violently from hard sci-fi to religious revivalism.

The premise reflects the twin anxieties of 1952: the atom bomb and the Soviet Union. The Cronyns use their high-tech radio to contact Mars, receiving messages that describe a utopian civilization. It is a world without war or scarcity, powered by atomic energy used solely for peace. As these broadcasts are made public, Earth descends into chaos. Western industrial economies collapse - who needs oil or coal when the Martians have free energy? - while the Soviet Union gloats, believing the Martian state proves the validity of communism.

This location provides the setting where the influence of Balderston - and the notorious primary plot line of the film - takes a sharp turn into the metaphysical. The messages shift tone. The Martians represent more than advanced engineers; they follow a Supreme Authority. They begin quoting the Sermon on the Mount. The revelation is shattering: Mars is a Christian theocracy, or perhaps, the literal Kingdom of Heaven.

The twist is double-barreled. It is revealed that the initial messages were faked by Franz Calder (Herbert Berghof), a vengeful Nazi scientist working from a secret outpost in the Andes (a location that adds a touch of pulp adventure to the stage-play aesthetic). Calder intended to destroy Western capitalism with the promise of free energy. But he loses control. The later, religious messages continue even after his interference ceases. The implication is staggering: the signal is real, and God is broadcasting from the fourth planet from the sun.

The climax of the film presents a bizarre synthesis of global politics and piety. A religious revival sweeps the globe. The Russian people, hearing the Martian gospel, overthrow the Politburo and restore the Orthodox Church. A Soviet theocracy replaces the communist one. It is a resolution that makes sense only within the fever dream of early Cold War propaganda, where the ultimate weapon against godless communism was not a missile, but a miracle.

The legacy of Balderston remains deeply imprinted on the production. Similarly to the manner in which The Mummy addressed the ancient past intruding on the present, Red Planet Mars addresses the ancient divine intruding on the scientific future. It is a formal, talky, and fascinating film. The sets consist of little more than a living room filled with oscilloscopes, and the players primarily deliver exposition into microphones, but the sheer ambition of the plot - to reconcile the Space Age with the New Testament - remains a unique moment in cinema history. It poses a question few other science fiction films attempted to address: What if the voice from the stars does not say "Take me to your leader," but "Peace be with you"?

Red Planet Mars